<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 919 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256919</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant company by holding that the demand of duty for the extended period was not sustainable due to the application of the principle of limitation. The disallowance of CENVAT Credit to a certain extent was barred by limitation, and the penalty imposed on the General Manager was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief and disposing of the application for extension of the stay order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 919 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256919</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant company by holding that the demand of duty for the extended period was not sustainable due to the application of the principle of limitation. The disallowance of CENVAT Credit to a certain extent was barred by limitation, and the penalty imposed on the General Manager was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief and disposing of the application for extension of the stay order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>