<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 915 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256915</link>
    <description>The appeal to set aside a penalty of Rs. 30,000 imposed on the appellant for abetting an offense was dismissed as not maintainable by the Commissioner (Appeals). The penalty was reduced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 30,000. The stay application was also dismissed due to the non-recurring nature of the issue and the amount being within the threshold monetary limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 915 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256915</link>
      <description>The appeal to set aside a penalty of Rs. 30,000 imposed on the appellant for abetting an offense was dismissed as not maintainable by the Commissioner (Appeals). The penalty was reduced from Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 30,000. The stay application was also dismissed due to the non-recurring nature of the issue and the amount being within the threshold monetary limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>