<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 913 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256913</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of appeal against dismissal due to the absence of Committee on Disputes (CoD) clearance. Despite arguments that CoD permission was unnecessary based on precedent, the tribunal emphasized the importance of seeking CoD clearance. Since the appellant had not applied for CoD clearance before filing the appeal, the tribunal concluded that the appellant could not proceed with the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:07:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 913 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256913</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the application for restoration of appeal against dismissal due to the absence of Committee on Disputes (CoD) clearance. Despite arguments that CoD permission was unnecessary based on precedent, the tribunal emphasized the importance of seeking CoD clearance. Since the appellant had not applied for CoD clearance before filing the appeal, the tribunal concluded that the appellant could not proceed with the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>