https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168371 The commentary explains that a court may use an unregistered document to prove severance in status between coparceners where the document does not itself create or transfer rights in immovable property, though it cannot prove a completed partition of specific property. It also states that a mortgagee's transferee can rely on the special limitation bar only by proving a transfer of the larger interest required for that defence. On the stated facts, the suit for redemption was treated as within time under Article 148, objections on jurisdiction and non-joinder failed, and redemption was confined to the plaintiff's father's half share. en-us Mon, 14 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:43:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168371 The commentary explains that a court may use an unregistered document to prove severance in status between coparceners where the document does not itself create or transfer rights in immovable property, though it cannot prove a completed partition of specific property. It also states that a mortgagee's transferee can rely on the special limitation bar only by proving a transfer of the larger interest required for that defence. On the stated facts, the suit for redemption was treated as within time under Article 148, objections on jurisdiction and non-joinder failed, and redemption was confined to the plaintiff's father's half share. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168371