<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 887 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256887</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Service Tax demand under the Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services category. The appellants&#039; activity of harvesting sugarcane and transportation was not categorized as a taxable service based on precedents and the nature of the activity. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, granting relief to the appellants and emphasizing the significance of legal interpretation and precedent in determining service tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 13:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 887 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256887</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the Service Tax demand under the Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency Services category. The appellants&#039; activity of harvesting sugarcane and transportation was not categorized as a taxable service based on precedents and the nature of the activity. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, granting relief to the appellants and emphasizing the significance of legal interpretation and precedent in determining service tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>