<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 885 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on bus reservation charges under &#039;tour operator service&#039; from 10/09/2004 and imposed penalty under Section 76, rejecting the rectification application. It emphasized that the charges were integral to the tour operator&#039;s service and previous rulings supported the liability. The Tribunal clarified that mens rea was not required for penalty imposition, and any delay in tax payment was sufficient. It dismissed the rectification application as it did not show apparent mistakes and attempted impermissible review of the order by reevaluating arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 09:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 885 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on bus reservation charges under &#039;tour operator service&#039; from 10/09/2004 and imposed penalty under Section 76, rejecting the rectification application. It emphasized that the charges were integral to the tour operator&#039;s service and previous rulings supported the liability. The Tribunal clarified that mens rea was not required for penalty imposition, and any delay in tax payment was sufficient. It dismissed the rectification application as it did not show apparent mistakes and attempted impermissible review of the order by reevaluating arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>