https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256882 The Court dismissed the Appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The Tribunal's interference with the orders was deemed justified due to factual findings and legal errors present in the case. The Court found that the Revenue failed to establish the classification of the stock as "loose" and concluded that the duty determined was not sustainable based on crucial factors and undisputed records. The earlier orders were considered perverse and vitiated by error of law, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal in favor of the Assessee. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2015 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256882 The Court dismissed the Appeal, ruling in favor of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The Tribunal's interference with the orders was deemed justified due to factual findings and legal errors present in the case. The Court found that the Revenue failed to establish the classification of the stock as "loose" and concluded that the duty determined was not sustainable based on crucial factors and undisputed records. The earlier orders were considered perverse and vitiated by error of law, leading to the dismissal of the Appeal in favor of the Assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256882