https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256861 The High Court held that the ITAT lacked jurisdiction in allowing the rectification application as the appeal was deemed not maintainable. The ITAT's direction for a fresh order without specific findings or directions nullified the original order, acting beyond its authority. The High Court found serious legal defects in the impugned order, ruling it lacked legal basis and was unsustainable. Consequently, the High Court quashed and set aside the ITAT's impugned order in favor of the petitioner, the Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Vadodara. en-us Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:10:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256861 The High Court held that the ITAT lacked jurisdiction in allowing the rectification application as the appeal was deemed not maintainable. The ITAT's direction for a fresh order without specific findings or directions nullified the original order, acting beyond its authority. The High Court found serious legal defects in the impugned order, ruling it lacked legal basis and was unsustainable. Consequently, the High Court quashed and set aside the ITAT's impugned order in favor of the petitioner, the Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Vadodara. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256861