https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168351 Section 11(2) of the Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Promotion, Pay and Pension) Act, 1973 was held unconstitutional because it sought to reopen and override a final judicial direction binding on the State; the provision was struck down as ultra vires, void and an encroachment on the judicial field. The limiting words in Section 4(2), 4(3) and 4(8) could not be used to deny consequential monetary benefits arising from deemed promotions granted by the final court order; those clauses were read down to that extent. The State was therefore required to honour the final mandate and pay the consequential financial benefits. en-us Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2015 15:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168351 Section 11(2) of the Karnataka State Civil Services (Regulation of Promotion, Pay and Pension) Act, 1973 was held unconstitutional because it sought to reopen and override a final judicial direction binding on the State; the provision was struck down as ultra vires, void and an encroachment on the judicial field. The limiting words in Section 4(2), 4(3) and 4(8) could not be used to deny consequential monetary benefits arising from deemed promotions granted by the final court order; those clauses were read down to that extent. The State was therefore required to honour the final mandate and pay the consequential financial benefits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168351