<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 844 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256844</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals in , after considering the case records, deeming them devoid of merit. The delay was condoned. Appellant was represented by Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, A.G., and others, while the respondent was represented by Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran and others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 844 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256844</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals in , after considering the case records, deeming them devoid of merit. The delay was condoned. Appellant was represented by Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, A.G., and others, while the respondent was represented by Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran and others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>