https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256840 In a stay application arising from a service tax dispute under Business Auxiliary Service, the Tribunal held that the amount of pre-deposit could be fixed having regard to the facts and comparable precedent. Because no tax had been deposited in the present matter, unlike the cited case, the Tribunal required a limited pre-deposit as a condition for interim protection. On compliance with the deposit order, recovery of the remaining tax, interest and penalty was waived and stayed during pendency of the appeal. en-us Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Feb 2015 05:03:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256840 In a stay application arising from a service tax dispute under Business Auxiliary Service, the Tribunal held that the amount of pre-deposit could be fixed having regard to the facts and comparable precedent. Because no tax had been deposited in the present matter, unlike the cited case, the Tribunal required a limited pre-deposit as a condition for interim protection. On compliance with the deposit order, recovery of the remaining tax, interest and penalty was waived and stayed during pendency of the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256840