<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 837 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256837</link>
    <description>Where the first appeal depended on compliance with a pre-deposit condition, the appellate forum had to decide that threshold issue before considering the underlying merits. The Tribunal was required to examine whether the pre-deposit was validly imposed and complied with, and could not bypass that statutory gateway to adjudicate the assessment dispute on merits. If the pre-deposit condition was unsustainable or needed modification, the proper course was to deal with that issue first and, if necessary, remit the matter to the first appellate authority. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on merits was therefore incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 837 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256837</link>
      <description>Where the first appeal depended on compliance with a pre-deposit condition, the appellate forum had to decide that threshold issue before considering the underlying merits. The Tribunal was required to examine whether the pre-deposit was validly imposed and complied with, and could not bypass that statutory gateway to adjudicate the assessment dispute on merits. If the pre-deposit condition was unsustainable or needed modification, the proper course was to deal with that issue first and, if necessary, remit the matter to the first appellate authority. The Tribunal&#039;s decision on merits was therefore incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>