<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (7) TMI 333 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168346</link>
    <description>SC employees filed writ petitions seeking pay parity with Delhi HC employees. SC passed interim orders granting equivalent pay scales based on the doctrine of &#039;equal pay for equal work&#039;. The CJI was directed to frame new service rules under Article 146(2), considering Fourth Pay Commission recommendations. Interim higher pay scales were maintained until final rules are implemented by the President.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 17:55:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (7) TMI 333 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168346</link>
      <description>SC employees filed writ petitions seeking pay parity with Delhi HC employees. SC passed interim orders granting equivalent pay scales based on the doctrine of &#039;equal pay for equal work&#039;. The CJI was directed to frame new service rules under Article 146(2), considering Fourth Pay Commission recommendations. Interim higher pay scales were maintained until final rules are implemented by the President.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>