<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Minutes of the 63rd meeting of the Board of Approval for SEZ held on 18th September 2014 to consider proposals for setting up Special Economic Zones and other miscellaneous proposals</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=53233</link>
    <description>Board decisions concerned extensions, approvals, amendments and cancellations under the SEZ regime: formal and in-principle approvals and LoPs were extended in multiple cases where progress justified it and rejected where implementation was unsatisfactory; co-developer approvals were granted with defined operational scopes and with an explicit reservation that tax treatment of lease/down payments/premiums is examinable by Assessing Officers; conversions to formal approval and name/shareholding changes were approved subject to continuity of SEZ obligations, fulfillment of developer eligibility and disclosure of financial and PAN/jurisdictional assessing officer details to revenue authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 12:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Minutes of the 63rd meeting of the Board of Approval for SEZ held on 18th September 2014 to consider proposals for setting up Special Economic Zones and other miscellaneous proposals</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=53233</link>
      <description>Board decisions concerned extensions, approvals, amendments and cancellations under the SEZ regime: formal and in-principle approvals and LoPs were extended in multiple cases where progress justified it and rejected where implementation was unsatisfactory; co-developer approvals were granted with defined operational scopes and with an explicit reservation that tax treatment of lease/down payments/premiums is examinable by Assessing Officers; conversions to formal approval and name/shareholding changes were approved subject to continuity of SEZ obligations, fulfillment of developer eligibility and disclosure of financial and PAN/jurisdictional assessing officer details to revenue authorities.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>SEZ</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=53233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>