<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 793 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256793</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar manufacturer, allowing their appeal and confirming their entitlement to CENVAT Credit on outward transport charges for delivering goods to the railway station or port of export. The Tribunal distinguished previous case law and emphasized the relevance of Circular No. 97/8/07-Service Tax in supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. The decision referenced relevant High Court rulings and upheld the appellant&#039;s position, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and disposing of the stay petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 793 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256793</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar manufacturer, allowing their appeal and confirming their entitlement to CENVAT Credit on outward transport charges for delivering goods to the railway station or port of export. The Tribunal distinguished previous case law and emphasized the relevance of Circular No. 97/8/07-Service Tax in supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. The decision referenced relevant High Court rulings and upheld the appellant&#039;s position, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions and disposing of the stay petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>