<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 782 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256782</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over a customs duty demand and confiscation of imported waste paper intended for specific use under a concessional duty rate. The imported goods were destroyed in a fire accident, preventing their intended utilization and raising questions about redemption fines and extended duty demand periods. The court considered the strict interpretation of exemption conditions under Notification No. 21/2002-CUS and legal precedents regarding duty demands when goods are destroyed due to unforeseen circumstances. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving the duty liability due to the uncontrollable destruction of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2015 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 782 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256782</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over a customs duty demand and confiscation of imported waste paper intended for specific use under a concessional duty rate. The imported goods were destroyed in a fire accident, preventing their intended utilization and raising questions about redemption fines and extended duty demand periods. The court considered the strict interpretation of exemption conditions under Notification No. 21/2002-CUS and legal precedents regarding duty demands when goods are destroyed due to unforeseen circumstances. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving the duty liability due to the uncontrollable destruction of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>