<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 772 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256772</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to prove understatement or concealment of income before resorting to external valuations under Section 69B. The court emphasized the necessity of rejecting books of account with proper justification before turning to alternative valuation methods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 772 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256772</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to prove understatement or concealment of income before resorting to external valuations under Section 69B. The court emphasized the necessity of rejecting books of account with proper justification before turning to alternative valuation methods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>