<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 753 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256753</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred without considering merits, remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits. The key issue was the disputed receipt of the OIO dated 12.01.2011 by the appellant, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant due to the lack of acknowledgment of delivery, allowing the appeal and providing an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 16:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 753 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256753</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred without considering merits, remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits. The key issue was the disputed receipt of the OIO dated 12.01.2011 by the appellant, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the appellant due to the lack of acknowledgment of delivery, allowing the appeal and providing an opportunity for a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>