<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 744 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256744</link>
    <description>The Court found that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in refusing to condone the delay in the case involving the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. The Court acknowledged the challenges faced by government entities due to staff shortages and emphasized the significance of a vacant managerial position contributing to the delay. Consequently, the Appeals were admitted and disposed of with the company required to deposit costs of Rs. 25,000 within four weeks for the Appeals to be restored, with no further extensions granted for payment. All contentions were left open for both parties on stay applications and Appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 744 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256744</link>
      <description>The Court found that the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal erred in refusing to condone the delay in the case involving the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited. The Court acknowledged the challenges faced by government entities due to staff shortages and emphasized the significance of a vacant managerial position contributing to the delay. Consequently, the Appeals were admitted and disposed of with the company required to deposit costs of Rs. 25,000 within four weeks for the Appeals to be restored, with no further extensions granted for payment. All contentions were left open for both parties on stay applications and Appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>