https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168332 Section 27 liability attached when a strike was instigated during the pendency of an appeal, because "appeal" in section 24 was given its plain meaning and no extra requirement was read in that the appeal must first be shown to be competent. The maintainability of the appeal was held to be a matter for the appellate court, and the statutory aim of preserving industrial peace would be undermined if parties could ignore the prohibition on their own view of competency. The representative-union scheme based on a minimum membership threshold was upheld as a reasonable regulatory classification, not a restriction on association or expression, and it was held not to violate Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(c) or 14. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:44:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168332 Section 27 liability attached when a strike was instigated during the pendency of an appeal, because "appeal" in section 24 was given its plain meaning and no extra requirement was read in that the appeal must first be shown to be competent. The maintainability of the appeal was held to be a matter for the appellate court, and the statutory aim of preserving industrial peace would be undermined if parties could ignore the prohibition on their own view of competency. The representative-union scheme based on a minimum membership threshold was upheld as a reasonable regulatory classification, not a restriction on association or expression, and it was held not to violate Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(c) or 14. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 24 Nov 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168332