<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 584 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168331</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly, and the High Court should not quash a corruption investigation at the incomplete-investigation stage by weighing untested materials as if conducting a trial. Annexures filed with the petition are not proved evidence, and the court cannot assess whether prosecution will end in conviction or require the investigating agency to establish the full source of income at that stage. In a prosecution under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, explanations and supporting documents, including income-tax returns, are matters for investigation and trial. On that basis, the quashing order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 584 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168331</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly, and the High Court should not quash a corruption investigation at the incomplete-investigation stage by weighing untested materials as if conducting a trial. Annexures filed with the petition are not proved evidence, and the court cannot assess whether prosecution will end in conviction or require the investigating agency to establish the full source of income at that stage. In a prosecution under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, explanations and supporting documents, including income-tax returns, are matters for investigation and trial. On that basis, the quashing order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>