<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 726 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256726</link>
    <description>The court quashed the attachment orders, ruling that without a notice of demand or notice under section 156, the petitioner could not be considered in default. Additionally, the provisional attachment under section 281B was deemed invalid due to the absence of a notice to pay arrears. The writ petition was granted, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 726 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256726</link>
      <description>The court quashed the attachment orders, ruling that without a notice of demand or notice under section 156, the petitioner could not be considered in default. Additionally, the provisional attachment under section 281B was deemed invalid due to the absence of a notice to pay arrears. The writ petition was granted, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>