<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: Prioritize Fair Outcomes in Delay Condonation Cases, Avoid Vested Rights in Injustice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21860</link>
    <description>Condonation of delay - when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred, for the other side cannot claim to have vested right in injustice being done because of a non-deliberate delay. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:42:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:42:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Substantial Justice Over Technicalities: Prioritize Fair Outcomes in Delay Condonation Cases, Avoid Vested Rights in Injustice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21860</link>
      <description>Condonation of delay - when substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, the cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred, for the other side cannot claim to have vested right in injustice being done because of a non-deliberate delay. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:42:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>