<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Anti-Dumping Duty Case: Shared Responsibility Between Respondent and Department; Fines and Penalties Dropped, No Goods Seized.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21854</link>
    <description>Levy of anti dumping duty - Misdeclaration of goods - it cannot be said that the respondent alone was negligent and not the department. Further, no goods have been seized or confiscated - levy of fine and penalty dropped - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:19:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Anti-Dumping Duty Case: Shared Responsibility Between Respondent and Department; Fines and Penalties Dropped, No Goods Seized.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21854</link>
      <description>Levy of anti dumping duty - Misdeclaration of goods - it cannot be said that the respondent alone was negligent and not the department. Further, no goods have been seized or confiscated - levy of fine and penalty dropped - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:19:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>