<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 662 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, leading to the quashing of the subsequent assessment order. Consequently, various issues raised by the appellant regarding transfer pricing adjustments, calculation errors, penalty proceedings, and interest obligations were not adjudicated as they became academic. The appeal of the assessee was allowed based on the invalidity of the notice under section 148.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:00:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 662 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, leading to the quashing of the subsequent assessment order. Consequently, various issues raised by the appellant regarding transfer pricing adjustments, calculation errors, penalty proceedings, and interest obligations were not adjudicated as they became academic. The appeal of the assessee was allowed based on the invalidity of the notice under section 148.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>