<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 658 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256658</link>
    <description>The appellant filed multiple appeals, including one for a rejected refund claim. The Tribunal remanded the case, directing the appellant to present all issues before the first appellate authority for a comprehensive review, emphasizing the importance of raising all relevant arguments. The appeals were allowed to proceed after withdrawal of unnecessary appeals, highlighting the need for adherence to procedural requirements and thorough argument presentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 23:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 658 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256658</link>
      <description>The appellant filed multiple appeals, including one for a rejected refund claim. The Tribunal remanded the case, directing the appellant to present all issues before the first appellate authority for a comprehensive review, emphasizing the importance of raising all relevant arguments. The appeals were allowed to proceed after withdrawal of unnecessary appeals, highlighting the need for adherence to procedural requirements and thorough argument presentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>