https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256642 The Supreme Court recorded the Union's undertaking that it would not acquire the end-user plant and would earmark and exclude the plant area from the auction and vesting process for the coal block. In light of that undertaking and the pending writ petition, the Court declined to examine the wider rival submissions, set aside the interim restraint on auction, and left all questions of law open for the High Court. The operative effect was to permit the matter to proceed subject to the recorded assurance, without determining the merits of the underlying legal controversy. en-us Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256642 The Supreme Court recorded the Union's undertaking that it would not acquire the end-user plant and would earmark and exclude the plant area from the auction and vesting process for the coal block. In light of that undertaking and the pending writ petition, the Court declined to examine the wider rival submissions, set aside the interim restraint on auction, and left all questions of law open for the High Court. The operative effect was to permit the matter to proceed subject to the recorded assurance, without determining the merits of the underlying legal controversy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256642