https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168313 The Supreme Court held that the presence of biased author-members on the Assessment Sub-Committee compromised the selection process. It allowed procedural changes by the State Government due to exigencies but emphasized the need for fairness. The Court rejected the doctrine of necessity for government officials on the committee with vested interests. No relief was granted for already distributed books, but guidelines were established for future selections, including barring authors from participating in the selection process and ensuring impartial committee composition. The State was directed to implement these guidelines for future book selections. en-us Fri, 10 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168313 The Supreme Court held that the presence of biased author-members on the Assessment Sub-Committee compromised the selection process. It allowed procedural changes by the State Government due to exigencies but emphasized the need for fairness. The Court rejected the doctrine of necessity for government officials on the committee with vested interests. No relief was granted for already distributed books, but guidelines were established for future selections, including barring authors from participating in the selection process and ensuring impartial committee composition. The State was directed to implement these guidelines for future book selections. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Aug 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168313