https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256639 The HC upheld the ITAT's deletion of an addition under s.69 relating to alleged payment of "on money" to builders, finding the Tribunal gave cogent factual reasons and there was no material to show investments beyond the return. The court held no substantial question of law or perversity arose to justify interference under s.260A, and no ground was shown to disturb the Tribunal's factual findings. Appeal dismissed; decision in favour of the assessee. en-us Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Oct 2025 12:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256639 The HC upheld the ITAT's deletion of an addition under s.69 relating to alleged payment of "on money" to builders, finding the Tribunal gave cogent factual reasons and there was no material to show investments beyond the return. The court held no substantial question of law or perversity arose to justify interference under s.260A, and no ground was shown to disturb the Tribunal's factual findings. Appeal dismissed; decision in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256639