<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 638 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256638</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that cinecasting/distribution of movies does not fall under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court agreed that the distributor did not perform any work for the exhibitor but entered into a revenue-sharing agreement. Therefore, the assessee was not obligated to deduct tax at source for payments to the distributor. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 638 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256638</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that cinecasting/distribution of movies does not fall under Section 194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court agreed that the distributor did not perform any work for the exhibitor but entered into a revenue-sharing agreement. Therefore, the assessee was not obligated to deduct tax at source for payments to the distributor. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>