<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 635 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256635</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of a delay in refiling the appeal and proceeded to dismiss the appeals challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The court upheld the reassessment of undisclosed income related to a property transaction, emphasizing the evidentiary value of vendors&#039; statements admitting a higher sale consideration. It held that the revenue had met its burden of proof with clear evidence, shifting the burden to the appellant who failed to rebut the presumption. The court relied on vendors&#039; consistent statements to determine the true market value of the transaction, ultimately dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 635 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256635</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of a delay in refiling the appeal and proceeded to dismiss the appeals challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. The court upheld the reassessment of undisclosed income related to a property transaction, emphasizing the evidentiary value of vendors&#039; statements admitting a higher sale consideration. It held that the revenue had met its burden of proof with clear evidence, shifting the burden to the appellant who failed to rebut the presumption. The court relied on vendors&#039; consistent statements to determine the true market value of the transaction, ultimately dismissing the appeals for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>