<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 624 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256624</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under Section 54EC and the indexed cost of acquisition of the property. The issue of interest levied under Section 234 was deemed consequential and did not necessitate further adjudication. The Tribunal based its decision on the clear language in the proviso to Section 54EC and previous judicial decisions, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 624 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256624</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding disallowance under Section 54EC and the indexed cost of acquisition of the property. The issue of interest levied under Section 234 was deemed consequential and did not necessitate further adjudication. The Tribunal based its decision on the clear language in the proviso to Section 54EC and previous judicial decisions, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>