<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 623 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s claim under section 80IB valid and not bogus. There was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unwarranted, leading to the deletion of the Rs. 20 lacs penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing material facts and following statutory procedures in claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 623 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the Assessee&#039;s claim under section 80IB valid and not bogus. There was no concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unwarranted, leading to the deletion of the Rs. 20 lacs penalty. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of disclosing material facts and following statutory procedures in claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>