<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that additions made for capital gain were unjustified as Section 50 and Section 50A did not apply to the sale of the depreciable asset. The Tribunal emphasized that the sale should be taxed solely under &quot;Capital Gain,&quot; deleting the additions related to capital gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2016 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 622 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that additions made for capital gain were unjustified as Section 50 and Section 50A did not apply to the sale of the depreciable asset. The Tribunal emphasized that the sale should be taxed solely under &quot;Capital Gain,&quot; deleting the additions related to capital gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>