<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 621 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256621</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the appeal, distinguishing between orders and intimation under the Income-tax Act. It held that the time limit of four years under section 154(7) applies to orders and not intimation. The rejection of the rectification application based on the limitation period was deemed unjust, and the matter was remanded for a decision on the merits by the Assessing Officer, with an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 621 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256621</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the appeal, distinguishing between orders and intimation under the Income-tax Act. It held that the time limit of four years under section 154(7) applies to orders and not intimation. The rejection of the rectification application based on the limitation period was deemed unjust, and the matter was remanded for a decision on the merits by the Assessing Officer, with an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>