<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 618 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256618</link>
    <description>The case involved disputes over penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to interpretation differences in Section 115JB and failure to compute book profit accurately. The CIT(Appeals) deleted the penalties, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed for legal interpretation variances. The judgment underscored the significance of precise compliance with statutory provisions to avoid penalties in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 22:49:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 618 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256618</link>
      <description>The case involved disputes over penalty imposition under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, relating to interpretation differences in Section 115JB and failure to compute book profit accurately. The CIT(Appeals) deleted the penalties, emphasizing that penalties should not be imposed for legal interpretation variances. The judgment underscored the significance of precise compliance with statutory provisions to avoid penalties in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>