<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Rule 10 Interpretation: Pan Masala Packing Machines Not Liable for Full Duty During Closure; Demand Set Aside.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21815</link>
    <description>Abatement under Rule 10 of Pan Masala Packing Machines - Closure of machines - Revenue&amp;#39;s case that the appellants should have paid the duty for the subsequent month in full and should have claimed the abatement separately is incorrect - demand set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:49 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Rule 10 Interpretation: Pan Masala Packing Machines Not Liable for Full Duty During Closure; Demand Set Aside.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21815</link>
      <description>Abatement under Rule 10 of Pan Masala Packing Machines - Closure of machines - Revenue&amp;#39;s case that the appellants should have paid the duty for the subsequent month in full and should have claimed the abatement separately is incorrect - demand set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:36:49 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=21815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>