<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 613 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256613</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal, stating that no Service Tax could be demanded on a reverse charge basis before 1.1.2005 as per the notification issued by the Central Government. The Tribunal also excluded certain payments made by the appellant to its agents from the gross value of taxable services. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 613 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256613</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI ruled in favor of the appellant in an appeal against the Order-in-Appeal, stating that no Service Tax could be demanded on a reverse charge basis before 1.1.2005 as per the notification issued by the Central Government. The Tribunal also excluded certain payments made by the appellant to its agents from the gross value of taxable services. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential benefits to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>