<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 609 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256609</link>
    <description>The Court held that the show cause notice issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I against one of the units was invalid due to jurisdictional issues and remitted the matter back to CESTAT for re-examination. The Court also upheld the validity of duty demand confirmation against two different units, emphasizing the importance of avoiding disruptions in tax proceedings and directing the matter to be reconsidered by CESTAT to prevent anomalous results.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 609 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256609</link>
      <description>The Court held that the show cause notice issued by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-I against one of the units was invalid due to jurisdictional issues and remitted the matter back to CESTAT for re-examination. The Court also upheld the validity of duty demand confirmation against two different units, emphasizing the importance of avoiding disruptions in tax proceedings and directing the matter to be reconsidered by CESTAT to prevent anomalous results.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>