https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256608 The court held that the appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act were not maintainable before the High Court due to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in matters concerning the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. The court emphasized the significance of precedent judgments and clarified that the nature of the order passed by the Tribunal determines the appeal's maintainability. The Revenue's allegations regarding curtailment of the limitation period and clubbing of clearances were addressed, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. en-us Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256608 The court held that the appeals under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act were not maintainable before the High Court due to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in matters concerning the rate of duty or value of goods for assessment. The court emphasized the significance of precedent judgments and clarified that the nature of the order passed by the Tribunal determines the appeal's maintainability. The Revenue's allegations regarding curtailment of the limitation period and clubbing of clearances were addressed, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256608