https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168306 In a prosecution for conspiracy under the IPC, charges against the respondent were quashed because the record contained no direct material showing his participation, and the case depended mainly on the alleged role of the principal accused. Once the principal accused's discharge attained finality, the foundation of the conspiracy allegation against the respondent was materially weakened, so continuation of the proceedings was not shown to be perverse. The delay objection also failed, as the respondent moved the court after the principal accused's discharge became final and the delay was condoned in the circumstances. en-us Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Dec 2015 09:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168306 In a prosecution for conspiracy under the IPC, charges against the respondent were quashed because the record contained no direct material showing his participation, and the case depended mainly on the alleged role of the principal accused. Once the principal accused's discharge attained finality, the foundation of the conspiracy allegation against the respondent was materially weakened, so continuation of the proceedings was not shown to be perverse. The delay objection also failed, as the respondent moved the court after the principal accused's discharge became final and the delay was condoned in the circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168306