<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 591 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256591</link>
    <description>A claim that a cash credit represented a genuine gift requires the assessee to prove the donor&#039;s identity, capacity or creditworthiness, and the genuineness of the transaction. Mere remittance through banking channels or from a foreign account is not enough; the surrounding circumstances, including the relationship between donor and donee and the stated occasion for the gift, must also support a real gift made out of love and affection. On the facts, the materials did not satisfactorily explain the donor&#039;s connection with the assessee or the basis for the large gift, and belated appellate material could not cure the deficiency. The addition was therefore sustained and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 591 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256591</link>
      <description>A claim that a cash credit represented a genuine gift requires the assessee to prove the donor&#039;s identity, capacity or creditworthiness, and the genuineness of the transaction. Mere remittance through banking channels or from a foreign account is not enough; the surrounding circumstances, including the relationship between donor and donee and the stated occasion for the gift, must also support a real gift made out of love and affection. On the facts, the materials did not satisfactorily explain the donor&#039;s connection with the assessee or the basis for the large gift, and belated appellate material could not cure the deficiency. The addition was therefore sustained and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>