<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 588 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256588</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the surcharge was not applicable to block assessments for the period 1989-1999. The proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act was interpreted as prospective, with the amendment creating the surcharge being considered substantive and effective from 1.6.2002. The Court clarified that the intention was to relieve hardships for the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation was upheld, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 588 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256588</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the surcharge was not applicable to block assessments for the period 1989-1999. The proviso to Section 113 of the Income Tax Act was interpreted as prospective, with the amendment creating the surcharge being considered substantive and effective from 1.6.2002. The Court clarified that the intention was to relieve hardships for the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligning with the Supreme Court&#039;s interpretation was upheld, dismissing the appeal and ruling in favor of the assessee without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>