<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 578 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256578</link>
    <description>Section 263 revision requires the Commissioner to independently record a reasoned finding that the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue before exercising revisional power. A mere mismatch between audit forms, or a possible clerical or typographical discrepancy, does not by itself justify setting aside an assessment for fresh inquiry. The governing principle is that revision cannot be used to direct the Assessing Officer to decide whether the order is erroneous; a clear jurisdictional foundation must first be established. On these facts, the revision was held unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 578 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256578</link>
      <description>Section 263 revision requires the Commissioner to independently record a reasoned finding that the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue before exercising revisional power. A mere mismatch between audit forms, or a possible clerical or typographical discrepancy, does not by itself justify setting aside an assessment for fresh inquiry. The governing principle is that revision cannot be used to direct the Assessing Officer to decide whether the order is erroneous; a clear jurisdictional foundation must first be established. On these facts, the revision was held unsustainable and quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>