<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 574 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256574</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the advance received against time slots should not be treated as income due to the absence of income realization and the advance being a liability repayable upon raising time slot invoices. The decision emphasized the importance of actual income realization and adherence to statutory provisions for accurate income computation, directing the Assessing Officer to evaluate the issue accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 574 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256574</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the advance received against time slots should not be treated as income due to the absence of income realization and the advance being a liability repayable upon raising time slot invoices. The decision emphasized the importance of actual income realization and adherence to statutory provisions for accurate income computation, directing the Assessing Officer to evaluate the issue accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>