https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168302 In a genuine closure or transfer of an undertaking, the deeming language in Sections 25FF and 25FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 operates only to compute compensation as if retrenchment had occurred and does not create continuing retrenchment rights. Section 25H applies to retrenched workmen in the sense contemplated by Section 25F, not to employees whose services ended on closure after compensation was settled. On the statutory scheme of the acquisition Act, only persons employed immediately before the appointed day could continue in service under Section 13; former workmen were not made employees of the transferee company. The claimed right to re-employment was therefore unavailable. en-us Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Sep 2025 19:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168302 In a genuine closure or transfer of an undertaking, the deeming language in Sections 25FF and 25FFF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 operates only to compute compensation as if retrenchment had occurred and does not create continuing retrenchment rights. Section 25H applies to retrenched workmen in the sense contemplated by Section 25F, not to employees whose services ended on closure after compensation was settled. On the statutory scheme of the acquisition Act, only persons employed immediately before the appointed day could continue in service under Section 13; former workmen were not made employees of the transferee company. The claimed right to re-employment was therefore unavailable. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168302