<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (5) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168295</link>
    <description>Section 18(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 is penal in nature and applies only to receipt of a fine, premium or like sum in respect of the grant, renewal or continuance of an actual lease. Money received under an executory agreement to grant a lease of premises under construction does not attract the provision because no completed landlord-tenant relationship or demise has yet come into existence. The surrounding definitions and scheme of the Act reinforce that the section is directed to existing leases, not mere future promises to lease. On that footing, the conviction could not stand and acquittal followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376155" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (5) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168295</link>
      <description>Section 18(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 is penal in nature and applies only to receipt of a fine, premium or like sum in respect of the grant, renewal or continuance of an actual lease. Money received under an executory agreement to grant a lease of premises under construction does not attract the provision because no completed landlord-tenant relationship or demise has yet come into existence. The surrounding definitions and scheme of the Act reinforce that the section is directed to existing leases, not mere future promises to lease. On that footing, the conviction could not stand and acquittal followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>