<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 569 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the value of diesel filled in generators should not be included in the assessable value for service tax. It determined that the property in goods (diesel) passed on to the service recipient before consumption for electricity production, similar to the principles established in a Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal found that the appellants&#039; obligation was to maintain the telecom towers&#039; operational condition, which did not necessitate including the value of diesel in the service tax assessment. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the disputed liability pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 13:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 569 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the value of diesel filled in generators should not be included in the assessable value for service tax. It determined that the property in goods (diesel) passed on to the service recipient before consumption for electricity production, similar to the principles established in a Supreme Court judgment. The Tribunal found that the appellants&#039; obligation was to maintain the telecom towers&#039; operational condition, which did not necessitate including the value of diesel in the service tax assessment. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit and stayed the recovery of the disputed liability pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>