https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256560 The CESTAT held that the appellants were entitled to the benefit under Notification No. 108/95 for supplies made to UNICEF for their official use, as certified by UNICEF. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication in accordance with the CESTAT order, allowing the benefit of the said notification for the relevant supplies made to UNICEF. en-us Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256560 The CESTAT held that the appellants were entitled to the benefit under Notification No. 108/95 for supplies made to UNICEF for their official use, as certified by UNICEF. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication in accordance with the CESTAT order, allowing the benefit of the said notification for the relevant supplies made to UNICEF. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 25 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256560