<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 555 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256555</link>
    <description>The court condoned a 5-day delay in filing the appeal due to the absence of the authorized signatory. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the appeal based on belated filing of the waiver application was criticized for not allowing the appellant to rectify the error before rejection. The lack of specific time limits for filing the waiver application weakened the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Consequently, the order rejecting the appeal was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in line with legal requirements. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in appeal processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 555 - CESTAT BENGLALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256555</link>
      <description>The court condoned a 5-day delay in filing the appeal due to the absence of the authorized signatory. The Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the appeal based on belated filing of the waiver application was criticized for not allowing the appellant to rectify the error before rejection. The lack of specific time limits for filing the waiver application weakened the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Consequently, the order rejecting the appeal was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration in line with legal requirements. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and adherence to legal provisions in appeal processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>